
Here's a problem every thermal vacuum engineer knows too well:
In a TVAC chamber, heat travels by radiation. Different materials absorb and reflect it differently — and a standard thermocouple is almost never a thermal twin of your DUT. Different absorptivity, different emissivity, different specific heat, different mass… so during a fast temperature ramp, the sensor and the sample live in two different thermal worlds. The number on your screen is the thermocouple's temperature — not your product's.
You can paint the junction, add witness coupons, chase time constants. But why ask a foreign object to imitate the sample?
Our answer: stop imitating. Make the sample the sensor.
For materials whose electromagnetic properties are temperature-sensitive, we machine the sensing element from the same material, same thickness as the DUT, place it at the same standoff distance from the radiant source — and read its temperature through its own electrical fingerprint:
Temperature → Resistance curve (T–R) 📈
Temperature → Inductance curve (T–L) 🧲
An LCR meter reads R (or L) through a vacuum feedthrough, a calibration library converts it to temperature, and what you get is the true real-time temperature of the sample — not of a sensor attached to it.
Identical α/ε ✅ Identical thermal mass ✅ Identical heat flux ✅ ⇒ Identical temperature rise rate. No lag. No offset. No apology.
When your test spec lives or dies on the dT/dt of the product, the thermometer shouldn't just be near the sample.
It should be the sample.
Here's a problem every thermal vacuum engineer knows too well:
In a TVAC chamber, heat travels by radiation. Different materials absorb and reflect it differently — and a standard thermocouple is almost never a thermal twin of your DUT. Different absorptivity, different emissivity, different specific heat, different mass… so during a fast temperature ramp, the sensor and the sample live in two different thermal worlds. The number on your screen is the thermocouple's temperature — not your product's.
You can paint the junction, add witness coupons, chase time constants. But why ask a foreign object to imitate the sample?
Our answer: stop imitating. Make the sample the sensor.
For materials whose electromagnetic properties are temperature-sensitive, we machine the sensing element from the same material, same thickness as the DUT, place it at the same standoff distance from the radiant source — and read its temperature through its own electrical fingerprint:
Temperature → Resistance curve (T–R) 📈
Temperature → Inductance curve (T–L) 🧲
An LCR meter reads R (or L) through a vacuum feedthrough, a calibration library converts it to temperature, and what you get is the true real-time temperature of the sample — not of a sensor attached to it.
Identical α/ε ✅ Identical thermal mass ✅ Identical heat flux ✅ ⇒ Identical temperature rise rate. No lag. No offset. No apology.
When your test spec lives or dies on the dT/dt of the product, the thermometer shouldn't just be near the sample.
It should be the sample.